Donald Trump Jr. stirred significant controversy on social media on Saturday, November 1, 2025, after posting a provocative message regarding his father’s $300 million ballroom project on Instagram. The 47-year-old, who is the eldest son of President Donald Trump, shared a post from comedian Adam Carolla that included explicit language in defense of the president’s initiative.
The Instagram story featured a post by Carolla, stating: “The real Trump ballroom is the room he gives his balls in comparison to the leg crossing p—ies like Newsom and Obama.” The post favorably compared President Trump to California Governor Gavin Newsom and former President Barack Obama, using explicit terms to depict them as weaker.
Carolla’s post included a photo of Trump sitting with his knees apart, alongside images of Obama and Newsom with their legs crossed.
Trump Jr.’s decision to share the contentious post was met with criticism from political analysts and social media users who deemed it inappropriate for a sitting president’s son. Although the post was removed after several hours, screenshots continued to circulate widely online.
Donald Trump Jr. has been a prominent supporter of his father on social media, regularly sharing memes and messages to endorse the 79-year-old president.
While his recent post involving Trump’s private parts is among his most controversial endorsements, it is not the first instance of Donald Trump Jr. causing a stir online. In August, he shared a partially AI-generated image depicting Trump tossing a green object from the White House roof onto a WNBA court, referencing past incidents involving similar objects at WNBA games.
Earlier, he posted an AI-generated image of Trump in full denim attire, a playful reference to Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle advertisement, accompanied by a humorous caption.
“That Hanse… Um, Donald is so hot right now!!!” Trump Jr. commented, referencing Owen Wilson’s character in Zoolander.
The $300 million ballroom project has become a divisive issue during President Trump’s term. Planned for the White House grounds, the “Grand Presidential Hall” is intended to host diplomatic events and official ceremonies.
President Trump has justified the significant investment, citing the need for modern facilities at the White House. He described existing amenities as “outdated” and “inadequate” for hosting international dignitaries.
During a press conference last month, President Trump emphasized the need for a space that reflects American greatness, stating that visiting leaders should experience the nation’s best offerings.
The planned ballroom will cover approximately 90,000 square feet and feature European-imported crystal chandeliers, American-sourced marble floors, and advanced audiovisual systems. Renderings depict a grand space with 40-foot ceilings and gold-leaf details, accommodating up to 1,000 guests.
Despite the administration’s rationale, the project has encountered strong opposition from both Democrats and some Republicans. Critics argue that the cost is unjustifiable amid federal budget pressures.
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez labeled the project as “grotesque excess,” emphasizing concerns about rising costs impacting working families.
The issue has sparked nationwide debate, with editorials and opinion pieces criticizing the project. Publications like The Washington Post and The New York Times have questioned its necessity.
The ballroom project has become a focal point for discussions on presidential priorities and government spending. Democrats have used the issue to highlight perceived disconnects between the administration and public concerns.
As the 2026 midterms approach, political analysts believe the controversy could influence campaign narratives. Democratic candidates have already begun highlighting the project in their messaging.
Supporters of the president argue that the criticism is politically motivated and that maintaining prestigious venues for diplomacy is important.
Despite the significant cost, the administration has clarified that the ballroom will be privately funded, with contributions from major corporations listed by Fortune. While this funding model aims to avoid taxpayer burden, critics raise concerns about potential conflicts of interest and call for transparency regarding donor arrangements.
Trump Jr.’s decision to share Carolla’s defense of the project indicates the first family’s stance on the controversy. The post reflects the confrontational communication style associated with the Trump brand.
