In a recent episode of “The Joe Rogan Experience,” the ever-controversial podcaster Joe Rogan stirred the political pot with his bold prediction: Vice President Kamala Harris could potentially win the upcoming presidential election against former President Donald Trump. This assertion has sparked significant debate and drawn attention to the dynamics of the 2024 race.
During the episode, cultural commentator Michael Malice joined Rogan for a candid discussion about the presidential election and Harris’ electability. “She’s gonna win,” Rogan declared, to which a visibly surprised Malice retorted, “No, she’s not.” Rogan clarified his stance, explaining, “I’m not saying because I think she’s going to, and I’m not saying because I want her to. I’m just being honest.”
Rogan’s prediction is rooted not in Harris’ popularity but rather in Trump’s divisiveness. “I feel like we are in this very bizarre time where people are giving in to the bulls–t in a way that I never suspected people would before,” Rogan argued. He believes the general sentiment among voters is to ensure “no Trump, no matter what,” even if that means voting for Harris.
Adding another layer to his prediction, Rogan suggested that even figures like Hillary Clinton or Michelle Obama could secure a victory against Trump if they decided to enter the race. This assertion underscores Rogan’s belief that the election could pivot more on anti-Trump sentiment than on the appeal of any single candidate.
A critical point of discussion between Rogan and Malice was the media’s role in shaping public opinion. Rogan lamented what he described as the “memory-holing” of significant events, notably Trump’s attempted assassination on July 13. “You would have thought Trump getting shot would have had four years of corporate journalists talking about hate speech causing violence,” Malice remarked. “To be like, ‘Let’s take a step back,’ and that went for, what, a week?”
Both Rogan and Malice argued that the lack of sustained media coverage of such pivotal events reflects a broader issue of media bias. They noted how tech giants like Google influence public discourse, with Rogan claiming, “If I Google Donald Trump and Google gives you seven negative stories, it’s going to move the needle a little bit toward her [Harris].”
The disparity in media treatment between Trump and Harris was another significant theme in their discussion. Rogan contended, “[Harris] is the least popular vice president of all time, and then in a moment, a moment in time, all of a sudden she’s our solution. She’s our hero. Try Googling a negative story on her, you won’t find one.”
This perspective aligns with Malice’s view that the media’s portrayal of Harris is disproportionately positive compared to the often negative coverage of Trump.
Rogan’s prediction and the subsequent discussion with Malice have sparked widespread interest and debate. While some view Rogan’s comments as a reflection of genuine concerns about media bias and tech influence, others see it as part of the ongoing discourse around Trump’s contentious political career.
As the 2024 election approaches, the dynamics of the race continue to evolve, with Rogan’s prediction adding a provocative twist. Whether or not Harris can indeed defeat Trump remains to be seen, but the conversation highlights the complexities of modern political campaigns and the multifaceted factors that can influence their outcomes.
